Platform

One experiment. Every candidate. A real number for each pair.

Traditional binding assays test one pair at a time. Lagomics tests all of them together, in a single pooled reaction, and uses sequencing to read out which pairs actually interacted and how strongly.

Mechanism

1

Barcode every candidate

Cell-free expression. Unique DNA tag per sequence.

2

Pool in one reaction

All candidates and targets together. No per-pair setup.

3

Enrich binders

Interacting pairs linked and kept. Non-binders washed away.

4

Sequence the pool

One Illumina run reads which barcodes survived. Pooled, barcoded, sequencing-based.

What you get back

Interaction matrix

A full interaction matrix: every candidate by every target, ranked by relative binding strength.

Off-target profile

Which candidates bind targets outside the intended set.

Epitope binning

Which candidates compete for the same binding site.

Structured data

Raw sequencing data, if your team wants to reprocess it or feed it into your own models.

Comparison

Traditional (SPR / ITC / ELISA / Y2H)Lagomics (pooled, sequencing-based)
Candidates per run1Thousands
Cost driverScales linearly with candidate countScales with sequencing depth, not candidate count
Off-target dataRarely collectedGenerated automatically
Turnaround for a full libraryMonthsWeeks
Infrastructure needed on your endInstrument time and protein purification per candidateA list of sequences

How we're building this

Starting with the tractable cases. Built to scale to the hard ones. We're validating this approach on well-established, well-characterized interaction types first. These are the cases where ground truth already exists, so we can validate the pooled, barcoded, sequencing-based method end to end before asking you to trust it on your hardest problem.

From there, the same mechanism scales to denser, less-characterized interaction spaces: larger candidate libraries, messier target sets, and many-to-many mapping problems that do not have good tools today. Early pilot partners help shape which interaction types we tackle next.